Titlebook: Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy; How Brazil Shaped Gl Alexandra Paulus Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

代表

書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy被引頻次




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy年度引用




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy讀者反饋




書目名稱Building Bridges in Cyber Diplomacy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

fertilizer

Introducing Key Concepts and the Analytical Framework,erature: the addressees of cyber norms, the scope of regulated behavior, the role of propriety, the socially shared nature, and the relationship between cyber norms and international law. Based on the resolution of these points of contention, I develop my own definition of cyber norms. Second, I int

amphibian

The Global Cyber Norms Debate,camps": the EU, the US, and like-minded states on one side and China, Russia, and like-minded states on the other. The divisive issues were the basic concepts of cybersecurity versus information security, whether rules for responsible state behavior with respect to ICTs should be codified in norms o

penance

Cybersecurity and Brazil,ed Brazilian foreign policy: the aspiration for global leadership, the desire to preserve but reform the international order, a commitment to and engagement with international law and norms, and what I call bridge-building in international affairs. After 2016, however, domestic turbulence led to a b

新鮮

licence

花費(fèi)

Norm Bridge-Building: Crafting Compromises at NETmundial, GGE and OEWG, the conference, the global debate on internet governance was divided between a multilateral and a multistakeholder camp. Brazil reached out to both sides and engaged passive actors during the preparation and organization of the conference, specifically in the drafting process of the outcome documen

Galactogogue

Passivity,norm proposal because they do not have access to the negotiation – what I call passivity by default. For Brazil, this applied to cyber norm proposals drafted by multilateral organizations Brazil was not a member of: the SCO, EU, FOC, G7, NATO, and the Commonwealth. Besides, Brazil remained passive b

declamation

空中

Introduction,S forum. Third, Brazil practiced norm bridge-building at the NETmundial conference and at two UN forums. Fourth, Brazil remained passive in the negotiation of several cyber norm proposals. I then outline the research design and methodology of the study, explain its limitations, and sketch the plan f