Titlebook: Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry; Barbara Casu,Andrew Gall Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

palliative

書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry網絡公開度




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry被引頻次




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry年度引用




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry讀者反饋




書目名稱Building Societies in the Financial Services Industry讀者反饋學科排名

有危險

A Brief History of Building Societies,ing some of the more recent changes to arrive at the shape we have today. We focus in particular on the demutualisation process that saw the largest building societies becoming banks. We then assess the impact of the financial crisis on the sector; we analyse the consolidation process that took plac

放逐某人

Legislation, Regulation, and Governance of Building Societies,ether with co-operatives and saving banks, form an important share of the financial sector in many countries. This chapter reviews the legal and regulatory framework with respect to building societies’ permissible activities and discusses recent developments. In addition, we consider the strengths a

Eosinophils

Culpable

The Performance of Building Societies: A Comparative Analysis,in the year 2000. Our results highlight the substantial impact of the financial crisis on the sector. Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) decreased for both groups in the wake of the financial turmoil, with 2008 and 2009 being particularly difficult years. However, as the UK economy re

羽飾

Book 2016omy and show that both groups have recovered some profitability, although not at the pre-crisis level. The reader will discover that building societies in particular have recovered well from the financial turmoil and they appear less risky than banks on a variety of measures. ?.

熄滅

oving economy and show that both groups have recovered some profitability, although not at the pre-crisis level. The reader will discover that building societies in particular have recovered well from the financial turmoil and they appear less risky than banks on a variety of measures. ?.978-1-137-60208-4

他去就結束

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0597-0um leverage ratio. Building societies in particular have recovered well from the financial turmoil, and they appear less risky than banks on a variety of measures, from lower volatility of earnings, lower volatility of net interest margins (NIMs), and higher z-scores.

Dissonance

POLYP

Book 2016e where public confidence in banking is low. Chapters present the results of an empirical analysis of the comparative performance of UK building societies, since the large-scale demutualisation process ended in the year 2000. The authors highlight the substantial impact of the financial crisis on th