Titlebook: British Working-Class Writing for Children; Scholarship Boys in Haru Takiuchi Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

運(yùn)動性

Conclusion: “The Awareness of Standing Between Two Cultures”of the 1960s and 1970s. In response to the views and tastes formed by their original working-class cultures, these children’s writers not only succeeded in including aspects of working-class culture (including language and lifestyle) in children’s books, but also succeeded in adjusting the boundarie

逃避責(zé)任

Annotate

photophobia

Robert Westall’s ,: The Scholarship Boy and Socialismdepiction of power of the dominant culture that deprives the scholarship boy of political power, and his emphasis on the political importance of class cultures, are significant when considering the meaning of class struggle for scholarship boy writers of this generation.

Constrain

真繁榮

Book 2017ocial science and education, this book also explores personal interviews and previously-unseen archival materials.?Yielding significant insights on British children’s literature of the period, this book will be of particular interest to scholars and students in the fields of children’s and working-class literature and of British popular culture.

CANDY

Sciatica

Nelson Pinheiro Gomes,William Afonso Cantú as both a scholarship boy and a teacher to illustrate the challenges and uncertainties facing academically able working-class pupils. In doing so, it highlights the historical background of the education system which produced scholarship boys.

exhilaration

Sebastian Pomik?o,Artur Strzeleckiambers carefully attributes the protagonist’s suffering from loneliness, anxiety and lack of confidence to the detachment of school culture from working-class lives, and the way Chambers posits reconciliation between the middle-class intellectual culture and working-class cultural inheritance as an ideal state.

Forage飼料

Sebastian Pomik?o,Artur Strzelecki a scholarship boy in standing between two class cultures. At one level, ., which is highly sophisticated and includes both intellectual content and working-class characters, reflects this view. Garner, however, depicts the difficulty of achieving this ideal in the form of the tragedy of the scholarship boy Tom.