找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots; A History of Futures Chris Renwick Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publish

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 29442|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:16:23 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots
期刊簡(jiǎn)稱A History of Futures
影響因子2023Chris Renwick
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/192/191169/191169.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots; A History of Futures Chris Renwick Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publish
影響因子A new and innovative account of British sociology‘s intellectual origins that uses previously unknown archival resources to show how the field‘s forgotten roots in a late nineteenth and early twentieth-century debate about biology can help us understand both its subsequent development and future potential.
Pindex Book 2012
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots被引頻次




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots年度引用




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots讀者反饋




書目名稱British Sociology‘s Lost Biological Roots讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:12:58 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:21:41 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:32:45 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:57:08 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:47:30 | 只看該作者
Martin Christopher,Malcolm McDonaldrestigious Balzan Prize, looked back at the ways his discipline had developed since its inception a little over 150 years earlier. ‘The sober attempts of a small group of dourly upright reformers and administrators in the nineteenth century to describe in a reliable way the real “condition of Englan
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:20:51 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:30:49 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:28:42 | 只看該作者
Produkt- und Sortimentspolitik,on the subject of heredity during the 1860s it had been a time when the ‘Political Economy Club was wont to dine cheerily, thinking their theory of individualism was “approximately perfect”. However, since then, Geddes explained, the Political Economy Club’s ‘pens [had become] rust’ and all had ‘bee
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:04:41 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 00:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
鄱阳县| 永和县| 安吉县| 巴东县| 平顺县| 青岛市| 卢湾区| 佳木斯市| 依兰县| 夹江县| 安泽县| 乐清市| 阳东县| 湘潭县| 五指山市| 安溪县| 阳江市| 博乐市| 江孜县| 海阳市| 随州市| 武山县| 无棣县| 万安县| 谷城县| 邢台县| 嘉定区| 夏津县| 夹江县| 宜章县| 陕西省| 花莲县| 台南县| 花莲市| 普兰县| 改则县| 田林县| 嘉禾县| 青田县| 临江市| 琼中|