Titlebook: British Politics on the Eve of Reform; The Duke of Wellingt Peter Jupp Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim

Taylor

書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform被引頻次




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform年度引用




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform讀者反饋




書目名稱British Politics on the Eve of Reform讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

兩棲動(dòng)物

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46488-1he principal features of British politics at one specific point in the early nineteenth century. My thinking was that in the list of distinguished analyses of similar kinds — Holmes on the early eighteenth century, Namier on the 1760s, Gash on the 1830s and Hanham on the 1860s and 1870s — a gap exis

indemnify

MEET

Market Driven Political Advertisingof the American war, the necessity of there being a single minister to act as an intermediary between the Crown and its ministers and to chair cabinet meetings was gradually accepted. It was also thought appropriate for such a minister to be the First Lord of the Treasury in view of the Treasury bei

勤勞

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77730-6y there were some politicians like Charles James Fox or his nephew, Lord Holland, who as late as 1806 argued in Parliament that the cabinet was unknown to the constitution and that the emergence of such conventions as collective cabinet responsibility were unconstitutional in so far as they restrict

要素

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10491-7nterest in collectivism led to the publication of a number of studies, the most important of which for this period was Henry Parris’s .. However, since then, with the exception of the publication of some highly useful compendiums of office-holders, interest faded until the appearance in 1989 of John

burnish

H. Schlussbetrachtung und Ausblick,tly that legislation has attracted systematic analysis and then mainly for the period before 1800. Our knowledge of the subject is therefore patchy although some general features do stand out. It has been established, for example, that a piecemeal process of reform in procedural matters began in the

反省

Das Konzept des Market Driving,ver doubted that conflict between two opposing forces — government and opposition — has been the dynamo of parliamentary politics since 1688. The formalisation in the Commons in the 1730s of the tradition of government sitting on the right hand of the Speaker and the opposition to the left underline

不可知論

medium

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5560-5, social and cultural conditions that shaped them. The mental and material worlds of elite and popular politics, it is thought, were so different that the former only took note of the more extreme manifestations of the latter, such as those expressed in the 1790s and the immediate postwar years; and