找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style; Jeremy Richardson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

[復制鏈接]
查看: 28800|回復: 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:21:18 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style
影響因子2023Jeremy Richardson
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/192/191118/191118.mp4
發(fā)行地址Re-defines the concept of ‘policy style‘ and engages with the debate to characterise a British policy style.Explores trends and shifts in this style up to the current day.Demonstrates the need for a p
圖書封面Titlebook: British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style;  Jeremy Richardson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho
影響因子This book revisits and re-defines the policy style concept and explores the long-standing debate in British political science concerning how best to characterise the British policy style. The book highlights several trends that suggest that the British policy style has shifted towards the impositional end of the policy style spectrum, bringing it more in line with the traditional Westminster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.
Pindex Book 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style網絡公開度




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引頻次




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用學科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style讀者反饋




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:56:38 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:17:12 | 只看該作者
Introduction: The Concept of Policy Style,andard operating procedures’. These changes are best characterised as a more . approach to policy-making, with a consequent reduction in the power and influence of interest groups and a general reduction in consensus, and even less anticipatory policy-making, with a shift towards a more . policy style.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:35:53 | 只看該作者
ster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.978-3-319-90029-2
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:36:00 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ce, corporatist and neo-corporatist arrangement appears to have been significantly eroded, even in countries where these arrangements were thought to be embedded. In short, there is much more government and much less governance.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:32:56 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:49:29 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:07:53 | 只看該作者
Book 2018haracterise the British policy style. The book highlights several trends that suggest that the British policy style has shifted towards the impositional end of the policy style spectrum, bringing it more in line with the traditional Westminster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:32:41 | 只看該作者
Government Without Governance: A Difficult and Risky Business?,lt of lack of proper consultation and deliberation. A means has to be found to avoid excessive interest group influence, which can lead to reform deficits, whilst mobilising the expertise which interest groups possess.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:16:21 | 只看該作者
Book 2018 a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 02:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
武义县| 巴彦淖尔市| 南华县| 金秀| 蒙阴县| 普兰店市| 新泰市| 伽师县| 平邑县| 城口县| 乌鲁木齐市| 华池县| 依安县| 上犹县| 会昌县| 通道| 台南市| 宜良县| 眉山市| 广丰县| 兰坪| 定兴县| 大荔县| 北碚区| 闸北区| 青铜峡市| 精河县| 宜章县| 栾川县| 吉木乃县| 辽源市| 凤冈县| 饶阳县| 肥西县| 万山特区| 博乐市| 军事| 娄烦县| 浙江省| 文昌市| 寻甸|