Titlebook: Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez; The Choice between E Saki Dockrill Book 2002 Saki Dockrill 2002 argue.bibliography.Britain.Europe.Grea

Helmet

書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez被引頻次




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez年度引用




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez讀者反饋




書目名稱Britain’s Retreat from East of Suez讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Infusion

Nonflammable

Mystic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02154-3 was for Britain a matter of water lilies. Over a number of years, the East of Suez role occupied much of the British governing elites’ time and energies. Their deliberations over this subject were closely related to Britain’s other problem: that is, how to maintain its power and influence in the post-war world.

最初

,Power and Influence, 1945–58,result, the process of juggling resources in order to maintain Britain’s great power status now began, a status which Britain felt it deserved after all the ‘sacrifices’ it had made during the war, when “We were alone,” “We fought on”, and, in the end, “We won”.’.

fiscal

,Three Roles, 1959–64,powers finally signed a Limited Test Ban Treaty outlawing nuclear tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under water, a significant step by the three major nuclear powers towards managing and controlling nuclear weapons..

antidepressant

Conclusion, was for Britain a matter of water lilies. Over a number of years, the East of Suez role occupied much of the British governing elites’ time and energies. Their deliberations over this subject were closely related to Britain’s other problem: that is, how to maintain its power and influence in the post-war world.

SLAG

2946-8329 , which was taken by the Harold Wilson Government in 1967-68. Contrary to received opinion, the author argues that the decision was not taken hastily as a result of the November 1967 devaluation. Nor is there any hard evidence to support the notion that there existed a ‘Pound-Defence‘ deal with the

騷動

Adaptable Production Structuresress, the US business community, and American public opinion were becoming impatient with the endless war in Asia. A Gallup poll in May 1967 indicated a marked decline of public support for the Vietnam War in the USA..

四指套

,The Final Verdict: January 1967–January 1968,ress, the US business community, and American public opinion were becoming impatient with the endless war in Asia. A Gallup poll in May 1967 indicated a marked decline of public support for the Vietnam War in the USA..