Titlebook: Britain, NATO and Nuclear Weapons; Alternative Defence Ken Booth,John Baylis Book 1989 Ken Booth and John Baylis 1989 defence policy.Europ

不感興趣

What is Wrong with Britain’s Existing Defence Policy?rd period of time, that it has given Britain status in the world and that it has been relatively cheap. In short, they assert that it has worked at an acceptable cost: so why change a winner? On first sight these sound plausible arguments: but they are too simple. As will be seen below, the criticis

SEEK

Towards a Stable Peacere of European security. In the shorter term, though, Britain could play a key role in accelerating trends towards a more stable peace. Unlike West Germany, Britain is not divided nor on the front line, and so is not caught up with a rather absolutist concept of nuclear deterrence and forward defenc

我要威脅

Towards a Non-Provocative Defence PolicyO’s military posture. But it is one thing to criticise existing policy; it is another altogether to replace it with something generally agreed to be better. Slogans are not enough, and in the 1980s anti-nuclear critics have been busy devising a now lengthy menu of non-nuclear alternatives. Their aim

在前面

Jacket

anesthesia

Nuclear Deterrence and the Preservation of Peaceweapons in Western strategy. The outcome of the 1987 British election has taken some of the steam out of the debate but the role of nuclear weapons remains a lively political issue. Such debates are not new of course. Throughout its history the North Atlantic Alliance has faced periodic waves of cri

裁決

不能逃避

Little

Cholesterol