Titlebook: Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919; The Herero and Nama Mads Bomholt Nielsen Book 2022 The Editor(s) (

聯(lián)系

書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919被引頻次




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919年度引用




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919讀者反饋




書目名稱Britain, Germany and Colonial Violence in South-West Africa, 1884-1919讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

cognizant

entitle

pessimism

Pre-, Intra- and Postoperative Guidelines, by the Germans in the genocide of the Herero and Nama were directly inspired by the British usage of such camps during the South African War (1899–1902) although with different application and purpose.

Mets552

吹牛大王

Medullary Nailing of Femur and Tibia,ritish and Cape actors were far more pragmatic regarding their involvement. While there was never formulated a clear policy towards the rebellions, any action were considered according to tangible British and Cape interests rather than notions of mutual racial responsibilities.

STING

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77380-8 an unwanted position, having to press what was to them an unimportant issue at a time where Anglo-German relations were delicate. In the end, concerns of the refugees’ welfare were secondary to economic, diplomatic and security interests.

Ferritin

可能性

Imperial Cooperation and Anglo-German Diplomacy,h Germany was a crucial factor in the actions and cooperation of the British and Cape governments. Crucially, however, cooperation was never straightforward and was given mainly for selfish interests rather than as a friendly gesture to Germany.

GLUT

Concerns and Non-Cooperation,ritish and Cape actors were far more pragmatic regarding their involvement. While there was never formulated a clear policy towards the rebellions, any action were considered according to tangible British and Cape interests rather than notions of mutual racial responsibilities.