Titlebook: Britain, France and the Entente Cordiale Since 1904; Antoine Capet (Professor of British Studies) Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division

言外之意

intertwine

衣服

florid

murmur

猛擊

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4860-6dically over the basis of European security and the place of Germany in the post-war world order. In the later 1920s the relationship was further strained by differences over commercial policy, the operation of the gold standard, war debts, disarmament and a host of other issues. Two features of the

暫停,間歇

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4860-6 was disarmament. From one point of view, this was hardly surprising: the island naval power and the continental land power were inevitably going to possess entirely different conceptions of disarmament’s strategic implications on their European and world contexts. Yet, from another point of view, t

大看臺

似少年

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0073-1d George and Clemenceau. In fact, Churchill and de Gaulle probably had greater significance for the . than any other pair of leaders in the whole century. This was partly because of their longevity and influence as national leaders — Churchill was prime minister in 1940–45 and 1951–55; de Gaulle led

dilute

Rectovaginal Fistula and Anal Incontinenceainly a degree of warmth on both sides felt by many but by no means all of the relevant policymakers, but in memoirs such as those of René Massigli, the long-serving French ambassador to London, it is tempered by a good deal of mutual misunderstanding, not least among his masters at the .. For altho