Titlebook: Britain and Nuclear Weapons; Lawrence Freedman Book 1980 Royal Institute of International Affairs 1980 Britain.Great Britain.nuclear.weapo

Comedienne

Nebulizer

The Nuclear Bias,ell into the next century. While we may think responsible policy on the nuclear programme requires some attempt to anticipate the strategic environment of the twenty-first century, it is more likely that, as in the past, the relevant decisions will reflect current pressures and interests rather than speculation over the future.

Fresco

Arms Control,al situation at a time when the requirements of domestic economic management point to constriction. One possible way out would be a period of serious detente, accompanied by equally serious arms control, which would calm East-West relations and allow both sides to reduce their force levels without a diminution of security.

有罪

ARK

venous-leak

The Problem of Strategy,, as . was only good for crude retaliation, lacking the accuracy for strikes against the enemy’s own strategic forces. In the new jargon of strategic studies, . was an exemplary ‘second-strike’ weapon.

臨時抱佛腳

Phenothiazines

護身符

Cruise Missiles , Ballistic Missiles,ld penetrate defences much more easily, but each missile was enormously expensive. Nevertheless, it was the progeny of the V-2 that came to occupy the central place in the arsenals of the super-powers after the war.

intoxicate

Catalyzing Social Impact Investmentsts were raised as to whether it was realistic to expect an American President to initiate a nuclear war, with the probable consequence of the devastation of his own country, in the event of conventional attack by the Soviet Union on Western Europe.