Titlebook: Britain and Biological Warfare; Expert Advice and Sc Brian Balmer Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

coltish

希望

phase-2-enzyme

Evaluation of Pregnancy Viabilitybiowarfare grew linearly with the growth of scientific research. I have argued throughout this book that the role of experts and the construction of threat was not such a straightforward matter. Once advice was formalized, the imperative grew for experts to feed their knowledge about germ warfare in

十字架

CHOKE

Biological Warfare and Scientific Expertise,litary combat and the ‘fantastic possibilities’ marked out by science and plagues remain elusive. Other weapons possess symbolic markers that signal their destructive capabilities. The mushroom cloud has become an icon of the horrors of nuclear weapons, the gas mask has assumed a similar role for th

palliate

Bacteriological Warfare as a Public Health Threat,re of the threat. Need arose as rumours of germ warfare activities in other countries grew persistently throughout the 1920s and 1930s. Previously, and in contrast to chemical agents such as chlorine and mustard gas — agents which had been used with deadly effects as a new form of weaponry during th

外科醫(yī)生

,Hankey’s ‘Step Further’, defence against a germ warfare attack. Working with the MRC, the members of the subcommittee had helped to establish the Emergency Public Health Laboratory Service and an attendant stockpile of vaccines and sera. At a time of widespread fear of bombing, the threat of bacteriological warfare had bee

做方舟

The Growth of Biological Warfare Research, anthrax cattle cakes and the rudimentary bomb were significant for their originality, but were nonetheless relatively modest achievements when compared with other wartime technologies such as atomic bombs, radar or operations research. Germany had neither employed biological warfare nor treated the

蜿蜒而流

Project Red Admiral,the nation coupled with the broader position of the Chiefs of Staff on their preparedness to use weapons of mass destruction. Growth was also driven by a more proximate Air Staff requirement, dating from immediately after the Second World War, for an anti-personnel biological bomb to be in operation

minimal