Titlebook: Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State; A Critical Introduct Steven Loyal Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 philosophy

FORAY

書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State被引頻次




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State年度引用




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State讀者反饋




書目名稱Bourdieu‘s Theory of the State讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

FAR

凹槽

enormous

Thomas M. Soeprono,Ganesh RaghuThis chapter looks at the difficulty of studying the state, introduces Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of the state and sets out the plan of the book.

收藏品

INCUR

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04677-7This chapter discusses how Bourdieu envisages the state as part of the field of power. It discusses his work on the state nobility and examines the state as part of a meta field possessing meta capital.

爭議的蘋果

Treatment at the Finsen InstituteThis chapter assesses the value of Bourdieu’s theory. It argues that his theory lacks some of the insights found in the work of Elias, Gramsci and Michael Mann. Nevertheless, it argues that Bourdieu provides an original and exciting empirically productive theory of the state when coupled with these other perspectives.

變量

H. H. Hansen,F. R. Hirsch,M. R?rthThis brief chapter reviews some of the main arguments of the book and ends the book by arguing that his work is both flawed and yet hugely important for undertaking empirical analyses of the state.

Fecundity

Introduction,This chapter looks at the difficulty of studying the state, introduces Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of the state and sets out the plan of the book.

使?jié)M足

,Bourdieu’s Theory of the State,This chapter outlines Bourdieu’s theory of the state as a monopoly of physical and symbolic violence. It examines Bourdieu’s view that the state exists both outside and within social actors. It highlights the state’s power of naming, authority and processes of delegation through acts of state.