Titlebook: Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France; The Spirit of the En Rogel L. Williams Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

corrode

書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France被引頻次




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France年度引用




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France讀者反饋




書目名稱Botanophilia in Eighteenth-Century France讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

動脈

Bereavement

吵鬧

kidney

Eviction

,Lohnt sich Mobilit?t? Ein Fazit,osition of sousdémonstrateur des plants. His elder brother, Antoine, Vaillant’s old rival, had arranged this more congenial appointment. While nepotism was so common in the 18th century as to make the appointment unexceptional, its novelty proved to be the striking competence of the appointee. In fa

Analogy

,Lohnt sich Mobilit?t? Ein Fazit,ning was in the law, at the Jesuit college in Dijon, but his preference for the physical sciences and mathematics soon dominated. And when, at twenty-five, he inherited considerable property from his mother, he was freed to devote his life to scientific studies. Although he was not a botanist by tra

Override

,Lohnt sich Mobilit?t? Ein Fazit,ul medical and botanical training. In 1770, at twenty-two, he embarked upon a professorship of botany at the Jardin du roi that he would hold until 1826. Nepotism, certainly, but no one has ever suggested that he had been ill-prepared for the post, and his subsequent achievements were virtually beyo

Armada

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91388-9an to those of the later 19th and 20th centuries. The use of plants for healthful nutrition, and their related use for the maintenance of health, was of primitive origin, providing the 18th century with an elaborate tradition of medicinal practices, both learned and folkloric. But whereas botany bec

ectropion