找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Borrowing Justification for Proportionality; On the Influence of Jo?o Andrade Neto Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Judicial

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 宗派
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:21:23 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:30:39 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1Judicial Borrowing; Principles Theory; Constitutional Migration; Robert Alexy; Supreme Federal Court of
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:00:09 | 只看該作者
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:19:55 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:08:07 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:05:03 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ogical and methodological choices that conform the study. Proportionality has originated in Germany, where it has performed a central role in the adjudication of disputes concerning fundamental rights. The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) has enthusiastically resorted to the test, remarkably to
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:37:52 | 只看該作者
On the Migration of Proportionality, test as a normative argument. It starts providing an overview of the specialized literature on the migration of proportionality and its reception in Brazil, where it has served the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Section?. briefly reconstructs the three phases of the historical development of proporti
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:34:51 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:55:47 | 只看該作者
A System of Rules and Principles,e either rules or principles in accordance with the principles theory. My task is not to confront whether the Federal Constitution allows one to conceive it as such a set of rules and principles, as this has not been under dispute in Brazil. I shall show instead that the STF’s understanding on princ
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:35:46 | 只看該作者
A Charter of Rights with Wide Scope, approach to rights (and which of their variant forms) provides the best understanding of the constitution. The two main rival approaches reflect the dominant legal practice in the U.S. and in Germany. In attempt to grasp the features of fundamental rights as they appeared in the case law of the Ger
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 20:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
咸丰县| 镇赉县| 桂平市| 昂仁县| 休宁县| 顺昌县| 曲沃县| 汾阳市| 商水县| 岐山县| 舞阳县| 吴旗县| 招远市| 和田县| 平潭县| 淅川县| 灌云县| 青阳县| 怀远县| 永丰县| 绥芬河市| 莲花县| 龙井市| 桦南县| 东辽县| 包头市| 沁水县| 澎湖县| 礼泉县| 泰安市| 无为县| 望都县| 冕宁县| 浠水县| 交口县| 大埔县| 铁力市| 田林县| 阿拉善左旗| 六安市| 水富县|