Titlebook: Borders of Socialism; Private Spheres of S Lewis H. Siegelbaum Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 Europe.

AMUSE

書目名稱Borders of Socialism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Borders of Socialism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Borders of Socialism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Borders of Socialism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Borders of Socialism被引頻次




書目名稱Borders of Socialism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Borders of Socialism年度引用




書目名稱Borders of Socialism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Borders of Socialism讀者反饋




書目名稱Borders of Socialism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

PANEL

Claiming Property: The Soviet-Era Private Plots as “Women’s Turf”ferent property systems upon peasants who were prime objects of government policy. In 1906, in 1928, and again in 1991, a passion for the private (Stolypin), the public (Stalin), and the private again (Yeltsin-Gaidar) evoked resistance in which women played a key role. In each case, government offic

Axillary

The Art Market and the Construction of Soviet Russian Cultures) typically waited until the end of the year to purchase decorative art, which “for some reason comes out of the budget for capital investment.” If there was money in this budget at the end of the year, the organizations spent all of it on art, which meant “a real boom in art salons.” It was catch

劇毒

阻撓

Feature

Domestic Life and the Activist Wife in the 1930s Soviet Unioney waited expectantly in their best dress, some seated on a flower-bedecked dais where they were joined by the Soviet Union’s highest-ranking officials, including Stalin himself. For three days, the women were congratulated by these officials and heard testimonials from their fellow delegates. Proce

廢除

Expediency

The Meaning of Home: “The Only Bit of the World You Can Have to Yourself” was not the bourgeois conception of the sanctity of family bonds, as expressed in the aphorism “my home is my castle.” In the ., they reminded readers, Marx and Engels had exposed the bourgeois ideal of the private sphere as a smokescreen that propped up the capitalist system. By giving the oppress

舊石器

“I Know all the Secrets of My Neighbors”: The Quest for Privacy in the Era of the Separate Apartmentof severe shortages in housing and the relocation of urban residents from communal housing into single-family separate apartments.. Unlike many reforms of Nikita S. Khrushchev’s regime, the mass housing campaign was a success and continued past his downfall in 1964. Moving to a newly built separate

改變立場(chǎng)

Private Matters or Public Crimes: The Emergence of Domestic Hooliganism in the Soviet Union, 1939–19iganism that many Soviet citizens encountered in films and read about in novels and newspapers. This stereotypical portrait reflected common ideas about who hooligans were and what they did. It also reflected contemporary concerns over urban crime, youth culture, alcoholism, and public safety. It re