Titlebook: Books Across Borders; UNESCO and the Polit Miriam Intrator Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

SPIR

書目名稱Books Across Borders影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Books Across Borders影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Books Across Borders網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Books Across Borders網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Books Across Borders被引頻次




書目名稱Books Across Borders被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Books Across Borders年度引用




書目名稱Books Across Borders年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Books Across Borders讀者反饋




書目名稱Books Across Borders讀者反饋學科排名

FLING

2634-6117 SCO’s role in the realm of books, libraries, and networks of information exchange during the early postwar, post-Holocaust, Cold War years..978-3-030-15818-7978-3-030-15816-3Series ISSN 2634-6117 Series E-ISSN 2634-6125

OASIS

流逝

CHURL

COKE

Books Across Borders: Translation and Cheap Books,spectrum of languages. It sought to establish a global, collaborative, quality translation program, including through its Catalogue of Representative Works and publication of what originally was a League of Nations periodical, the .. UNESCO also encouraged the production and publication of affordabl

Conquest

The Contested Fate of Confiscated Books and Objectionable Literature,well as of the often-forgotten category of fascist and other “objectionable literature” confiscated by the Allies during and after liberation. These debates extended to questions of ownership of and rights to entire library collections confiscated or displaced during the war. To that end, this chapt

玉米

nettle

Access to Books, Libraries, and Information: Cultural Right, Human Right, Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In particular, Article 19 regarding freedom of expression and freedom to information, Article 26 regarding education, and Article 27 regarding culture have been linked conceptually and practically to UNESCO from the time of their drafting. UNESCO’s 194

calumniate

Conclusion: From the Postwar to Today,s. The example of the library in Valognes, France, badly damaged by Allied bombardment during liberation, is used to illustrate inherent unfairness and perceived biases within UNESCO at the time. The conflict heightened around 1951 with the downsizing of UNESCO’s Reconstruction Program. War-devastat