Titlebook: Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal; James T. Cushing,Arthur Fine,Sheldon Goldstein Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Med

semiskilled

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04694-9ime-evolved state during a measurement is widely regarded as a meaningless one within conventional quantum mechanics. Despite this, a large number of theoretical papers, including several reviews (e.g., Hauge and Stovneng 1989; Landauer and Martin 1994), have been devoted to various characteristic t

committed

Fraudulent

Mehrdeutigkeit und Religion in Oscar Wildes ial element of the commonly accepted interpretation of the quantum theory. Complementarity can be criticised on many grounds, but the main motivating element for me to seek an alternative interpretation is the following. I take Bohr’s complementarity to deny the possibility of a description of under

格子架

暴發(fā)戶

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-99629-9ed notions of “observation” or “measurement”, and the relation to classical mechanics is unproblematic, the latter simply being a good approximation to the “true” (Bohmian) dynamics under certain precisely definable conditions.

來自于

Literatur - Gesellschaft - NationBell 1987a; Albert 1992; 1994; Dtirr .. 1992a,b; 1993; Bohm and Hiley 1993; Holland 1993; Cushing 1994; Berndl, Daumer, Dürr, Goldstein, and Zanghì 1995) is an augmentation of “bare” quantum mechanics (the bare theory being given by an algebra of operators and a quantum state that sets the expectati

助記

rods366

,Georg Kaiser: Die Rückkehr zum Menschen,eories shared some central ideas but also differed in significant respects, and an assessment of all of these variant theories is beyond the scope of this paper. We shall mainly restrict our attention to what we shall call “Rohm’s initial theory,” which was presented in his pioneering papers (Bohm 1

柳樹；枯黃

Dokumentarliteratur als Produktivkraftechanics, that is, an account that merely takes the phenomenological laws of quantum mechanics as its unexplained given. Thus, by a version of Ockam’s razor, I conclude that we do not have sufficient reason to believe that Bohm’s theory is (approximately) true — that is, that it provides a basically

值得尊敬