Titlebook: Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature; Creativity in the Wr Paul Whickman Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

PEL

書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature被引頻次




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature年度引用




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature讀者反饋




書目名稱Blasphemy and Politics in Romantic Literature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

孤僻

不透明性

Blasphemy and the Shelley Canon: , and ,m its copyright protection meant that it was frequently pirated, becoming Shelley’s most widely read work. This chapter argues that this impacted Shelley’s late and posthumous reputation, with .’s illegitimate dissemination influencing the publication of more ‘official’ editions of his works. Attent

遭遇

Vulgar Anthropomorphisms: Blasphemy, Power and the Philosophy of Language,Noting the influence of Enlightenment philosophy on his thought, this chapter argues that Shelley determines the ‘problem’ of God to be one of language. In identifying ‘God’ as a mere word or metaphor that has been falsely anthropomorphised, Shelley’s poetry of the sublime resists the definitiveness

Autobiography

,The Promethean Conqueror, the Galilean Serpent and the Jacobin Jesus: Shelley’s Interpretation(s) ohese seemingly contradictory positions. In arguing that Shelley views Jesus as a human, political reformer who was crucified for his reformist sentiments, this chapter shows that, for Shelley, the subsequent deification of Christ has led to Jesus’ teachings becoming corrupted into the very faith sys

FOIL

GLADE

不可接觸

Paul WhickmanEmphasizes the significance of religious thought in influencing the philosophy and aesthetics of Romanticism.Traces the philosophical development within Shelley’s oeuvre and throughout his career.Cont

流動才波動

突襲

Conclusion,ic and political project. Following an account of his posthumous reputation, this chapter offers some closing remarks on the subject of Shelley’s canonicity: it is argued that Shelley’s canonisation risks him becoming part of the very establishment opposed by his radical poetry, philosophy and politics.