Titlebook: Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits; An Inquiry into Rese Brian Rappert Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

乳缽

書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits被引頻次




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits年度引用




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits讀者反饋




書目名稱Biotechnology, Security and the Search for Limits讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

盤旋

The Dilemmas of Dual-use Researche applications of the life sciences. Questions were posed not only about the choices and challenges in conducting biological research but also in examining dual-use issues in the first place. With regard to both, questions can be posed about what needs to be done and what is at stake in the way rese

同步信息

acclimate

Inquiry, Engagement, and Educationnce and biomedicine. In these, the question of ‘What should be done?’ loomed large. Chapter 2 reviewed many of the concerns expressed regarding what effect policy responsive measures might have on the char-acter of scientific research. The presumptions about how science operates underlying voiced co

ABOUT

jovial

Openness and Constraintlicy-orientated presentations to the National Academy of Science, the Royal Society, the United Nations, and others. Yet, it skimmed over many of the details and complexities of what happened in order to present a sense of the overall transformations in what was asked and what was said.

invade

誘惑

Expertise and Equality defined. The greater the extent to which any defini-tion portrays them as technical ones of calculating how best to achieve some agreed end, then the more likely the who and the how of decision-making will be restricted to the activities of specialized experts. The greater the extent to which any d

affluent

Closing Remarksging concerns about the ‘dual-use’ potential of life science research, it has considered what might be done in response. As has been contended from the start, though, assessments of what needs doing are inescapably bound up with how an understanding is developed of the issues at stake. As such, any

驚惶