找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights; Roberto Bin,Sara Lorenzon,Nicola Lucchi Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Milan 2012 biotec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 根深蒂固
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:36:49 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:44:51 | 只看該作者
The Turbulence of Academic Collaborationfocused on the “common heritage argument” according to which genetic human heritage is a common good that cannot be subject to intellectual property rules. First of all the most important theories on genetic heritage as common good are illustrated, then the relationship between patents and access to
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:49:09 | 只看該作者
Issues and Rights in DNA-based Inventionsl issues that result from the patenting of biotech inventions with a specific emphasis on the effects of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) patents and their potential to interfere with fundamental individual rights and civil liberties.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:17:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22030-3l issues that result from the patenting of biotech inventions with a specific emphasis on the effects of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) patents and their potential to interfere with fundamental individual rights and civil liberties.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:12:04 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:39:54 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:28:11 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2032-0biotech innovations; biotech patents; fundamental rights; genetic research; genetica data
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:49:34 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:06:12 | 只看該作者
Patentability Requirements of Biotech Inventions at the European Patent Office: Ethical IssuesThe main patentability criteria applied by the European Patent Office on inventions in the Biotech field are herein discussed, with particular reference to the ethical aspects related to this field of technology.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:06:19 | 只看該作者
Daryl John Powell,Erlend Alfnes,Eivind Rekeontroversy as a paradigmatic example, I reflect on the importance of fundamental rights as an institutional safeguard against the expansionary tendency of intellectual property law and on the role of the judiciary as guarantor of social cohesion, endangered by the disruptive effects of market rationality.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 22:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
崇州市| 潮州市| 沙坪坝区| 喀喇沁旗| 潼南县| 澄迈县| 保康县| 龙海市| 揭阳市| 察隅县| 平乐县| 滨州市| 龙泉市| 奈曼旗| 新乐市| 高安市| 徐州市| 汉中市| 厦门市| 兴隆县| 长宁县| 洪泽县| 靖远县| 东方市| 榆中县| 通化县| 冕宁县| 额济纳旗| 西乡县| 正镶白旗| 宣威市| 密云县| 莱西市| 罗平县| 丹巴县| 西吉县| 黔东| 芮城县| 宣化县| 建平县| 蒙城县|