找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law; Ulrich Storz,Martin Quodbach,Matthew Parker Book 2014 The Author(s) 2014 America Invents Act.Eu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 7349|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:40:13 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law
影響因子2023Ulrich Storz,Martin Quodbach,Matthew Parker
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/189/188307/188307.mp4
發(fā)行地址Addresses currently debated issues concerning biotechnological inventions.Written by internationally active experts.Provides a basis for understanding biotech patentability.Includes supplementary mate
學(xué)科分類SpringerBriefs in Biotech Patents
圖書封面Titlebook: Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law;  Ulrich Storz,Martin Quodbach,Matthew Parker Book 2014 The Author(s) 2014 America Invents Act.Eu
影響因子.SpringerBriefs in Biotech Patents. presents timely reports on intellectual properties (IP) issues and patent aspects in the field of biotechnology. This volume focus on particular aspects of the US patent law, which can have tremendous differences compared to the European law. This includes questions of biopatent prosecution, novelty, inventive step, written disclosure and sufficiency of enablement as well as questions of law enforcement of biotech patents..
Pindex Book 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law被引頻次




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law年度引用




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:14:46 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:22:19 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:27:58 | 只看該作者
SpringerBriefs in Biotech Patentshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/188307.jpg
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:43:41 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0378-8A contribution to the litigation of patents in Europe with special references to biotechnological inventions and to the practice according to the German system of patent enforcement.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:46:01 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:02:58 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:46:36 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:27:16 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41293-6America Invents Act; European Patent Convention; Medical use claims; Patent litigation; Therapeutic comp
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:55:36 | 只看該作者
Patentability Requirements of Biotech Patents,itten description, best mode, and sufficiency of disclosure. Differences between Europe and the United States are highlighted, and practical implications are discussed with respect to the biopatent field.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 17:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
莱州市| 永德县| 涡阳县| 霸州市| 河间市| 沂南县| 手机| 太湖县| 浙江省| 株洲市| 陆川县| 叙永县| 白朗县| 兴义市| 宾川县| 松滋市| 泾阳县| 马鞍山市| 崇文区| 石首市| 蓝田县| 佳木斯市| 称多县| 永胜县| 额尔古纳市| 龙南县| 卓尼县| 阿拉善盟| 唐河县| 武安市| 新野县| 广东省| 舟曲县| 西贡区| 富锦市| 嘉定区| 玉田县| 琼结县| 策勒县| 遵义县| 电白县|