Titlebook: Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation; Pedro‘Serna,José-Antonio Seoane Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

Lincoln

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Fibrillation

Values and Bioethics,projects and make sound, reasonable, responsible and prudent decisions. And because all human projects include three aspects, the cognitive, the emotional and the operational or practical, deliberation will also proceed in three steps. First of all we must discuss the facts, reducing uncertainty in

recession

A Human Rights Approach to Bioethics,erged from the same dramatic events: the Second World War, the Holocaust, and the Nuremberg trials. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948, which would become the cornerstone of the international human rights law, was to a significant extent informed by the horror caused by the rev

Obedient

Philosophical Imperialism? A Critical View of North American Principlist Bioethics,ctice of biomedical Ethics resulting from the determination of four basic moral principles that are part of the common morality, understood, in its turn, as a set of universally shared moral beliefs. In spite of the appeal of the proposal, some objections can be made. This paper seeks to introduce t

驚惶

Principlism and Normative Systems,emporary Bioethics. The aim of this chapter is to assess it under the perspective of normative systems. Regardless its important achievements, the main difficulties that have been identified are the following. First, it does not succeed to justify the normativity of the model, considering the histor

訓(xùn)誡

Types of Action and Criteria for Individualizing Them: The Case of Omission of Life-Saving Care,is a necessary condition for both the efficiency of their guiding function and the objectivity of their judging function. To support this thesis, we will first analyze the cognitive and semantic assumptions entailed in both the claim that the abstract types of actions are distinguishable, and the cl

Radiation

前奏曲

induct

International Bioethics Committees: Conditions for a Good Deliberation, depending upon the entity that creates them, their regional scope, the issues they deal with, the ruling strength of their agreements, etc. Among them, international bioethics committees are particularly relevant due to the huge impact of their work on global public opinion, as well as on the polic

labile