Titlebook: Beyond Principles and Parameters; Essays in Memory of Kyle Johnson,Ian Roberts Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 In

蓋他為秘密

試驗(yàn)

Civilizations or Realities of the Extreme ,The analysis of the French construction of Complex Inversion illustrated in (1) below raises difficulties with respect to current conceptions of available phrase structure:

offense

The Internal and External Distribution of Pronominal DPs,The form and distribution of pronouns varies considerably cross-linguistically. In this paper, I will propose that there is a direct relation between the form (i.e. DP internal realization), and syntactic distribution (i.e. DP external realization).

劇本

Subject Clitics in French and Romance Complex Inversion and Clitic Doubling,The analysis of the French construction of Complex Inversion illustrated in (1) below raises difficulties with respect to current conceptions of available phrase structure:

現(xiàn)代

滔滔不絕地講

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57202-8 had to this point engendered theories which remained within the grip of the philologists’ construction-based vision. Their image of language as a catalogue of independent constructions served as the backdrop against which much of transformational grammar’s detailed exploration evolved. In a sense,

Inordinate

凝視

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57202-8 many important insights. Originating with a proposal of Ritter (1987, 1988) many analyses of that construction seek to tie (at least some of) its properties to raising of N to D (cf. Ritter, (1987, 1988, 1991); Fassi Fehri (1988, 1989, 1994); Ouhalla (1990, 1991); Hazout (1990); Muhammad (1988); Du

去才蔑視

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57202-8u do it. Thus, Joseph Hall’s famous line: “God loveth adverbs”. Humoring the puritan’s grammatical metaphor we can speculate that God’s second love falls on Indirect Objects, the dative beneficiaries of one’s actions. And it is of God’s second love that I’ll write here; in particular about certain s

Pseudoephedrine

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57202-8ed between raising and control predicates. Although these verbs clearly behave as raising predicates, as shown by the paradigm sentences in (1) first pointed out by Perlmutter (1970), the fact that they can also occur in simple transitive structures, as shown in (2), has led many syntacticians to po