找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Beyond Legitimation; Essays on the Proble Donald Wiebe Book 1994 Donald Wiebe 1994 Immanuel Kant.philosophy of religion.religion.religious

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 22457|回復(fù): 60
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:27:19 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Beyond Legitimation
期刊簡稱Essays on the Proble
影響因子2023Donald Wiebe
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/186/185219/185219.mp4
學(xué)科分類Library of Philosophy and Religion
圖書封面Titlebook: Beyond Legitimation; Essays on the Proble Donald Wiebe Book 1994 Donald Wiebe 1994 Immanuel Kant.philosophy of religion.religion.religious
影響因子The early essays in this volume proceed on the assumption that a compatibility system can be fashioned that will not only bring religious knowledge claims into harmony with scientific claims but will also show there to be a fundamental similarity of method in religious and scientific thinking. They are not, however, unambiguously successful. Consequently Professor Wiebe sets out in the succeeding essays to seek an understanding of the religion/science relationship that does not assume they must be compatible. That examination, in the final analysis, reveals a fundamental contradiction in the compatibility system building programme which more than suggests that religious belief (knowledge) is beyond legitimation.
Pindex Book 1994
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Beyond Legitimation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation被引頻次




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation年度引用




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation讀者反饋




書目名稱Beyond Legitimation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:01:38 | 只看該作者
Is Religious Belief Problematic?o be undertaken. Care needs to be exercised, for example, in distinguishing kinds of belief — behavioural beliefs from rational beliefs, conscious from unconscious beliefs, ‘belief that’from ‘belief in,’and so on — if confusion is to be avoided..Similarly it must be made clear whether the analysis i
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:50:55 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:34:56 | 只看該作者
Explanation and Theological Methodrom scientific explanation’.. Philosophers of science have in general found themselves in agreement with this evaluation of religious discourse. Science, they have almost unanimously claimed, has achieved a generalized theoretical knowledge of the fundamental conditions determining the events and pr
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:11:46 | 只看該作者
Science and Religion: Is Compatibility Possible? communities, seem utterly naive. Since the days of Galileo and Urban VIII, it can be argued, the image of conflict has appropriately dominated all discussion of the relation of religion to science. The dominant picture, as Andrew White’s famous . (1896) illustrates (although some what onesidedly),
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:56:16 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:22:04 | 只看該作者
Is Science Really an Implicit Religion?cannot be denied that it is both a religious and a scientific culture, but neither can it be denied that there has existed a constant tension between its scientific and religious communities at least since the emergence of modern Western science at the close of the Middle Ages. Indeed so often has t
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:34:47 | 只看該作者
Religion, Science, and the Transformation of ‘Knowledge’students of Western culture would agree that there has been a persistent tension — even warfare — between the scientific and religious communities in the West, at least since the emergence of modem Western science in Europe at the close of the Middle Ages.. I would argue, moreover, that that tension
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:39:42 | 只看該作者
Has Philosophy of Religion a Place in the Agenda of Theology?ssurances that a fully developed statement on the issue was not expected made the exercise appear far easier than I found it to be. The simple question presented for comment — Has Philosophy of Religion a Place in the Agenda of Theology? -is not so simple, for even what philosophy, religion and theo
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:00:19 | 只看該作者
Postulations for Safeguarding Preconceptionseligion has for the most part been seen as an activity continuous with the religious life itself. It has usually been understood, that is, as a rational explication of the import of religious experience; or, perhaps, in a more critical vein, as an examination of the doctrinal/dogmatic contents (whet
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 09:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
旬邑县| 华阴市| 桐城市| 新绛县| 云浮市| 象州县| 栖霞市| 安国市| 自贡市| 囊谦县| 黄山市| 封开县| 阿坝县| 如东县| 长宁区| 黎城县| 奈曼旗| 开平市| 林州市| 崇礼县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 建始县| 漳平市| 布尔津县| 花莲市| 揭东县| 建水县| 怀化市| 仁布县| 桦川县| 武陟县| 唐山市| 禹州市| 隆回县| 康定县| 贺州市| 曲水县| 屯昌县| 高州市| 奉新县| 枣庄市|