找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Beyond Legal Positivism; The Moral Authority Whitley R. P. Kaufman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 機會
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:29:08 | 只看該作者
OPEC in the Age of Climate Change,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:57:15 | 只看該作者
Normative Legal Positivism,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:18:32 | 只看該作者
Book 2023been that there is no necessary connection between law and morality. This book provides a broad but clear and jargon-free account of the central objections to the theory and why those objections are sufficient to show that legal positivism is no longer tenable. This includes a broad critique of the
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:39:02 | 只看該作者
The Function of Law,way to explain and understand a human artifact like law is not in terms of ‘essences’ or necessary properties but in terms of its purpose. The aim of law is to establish a single, comprehensive moral code with which a society can organize itself.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:29:18 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:00:07 | 只看該作者
Book 2023ool arises from a caricatured account of that doctrine, for instance the idea that it requires substantive theological commitments or particular conceptions of human nature. In contrast, the author presents an account of natural law theory that is grounded in a commitment to moral truth, but not to
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:05:55 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:51:19 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:14:32 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:47:40 | 只看該作者
The Problem of Legal Authority, law and morality, whether that be expressed through the Separability Thesis or the Social Fact Thesis (that law is a matter of social fact, not moral truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligat
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 17:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
裕民县| 原平市| 崇文区| 安庆市| 尚义县| 石城县| 平陆县| 互助| 乐陵市| 镇坪县| 偏关县| 泰州市| 会东县| 如皋市| 上高县| 广南县| 九龙城区| 鹤壁市| 都匀市| 西和县| 舞阳县| 平舆县| 霍林郭勒市| 乌兰察布市| 德阳市| 宁乡县| 屯门区| 富裕县| 九寨沟县| 进贤县| 罗平县| 黄山市| 济宁市| 永清县| 务川| 定兴县| 宝山区| 花垣县| 开封市| 新泰市| 河西区|