Titlebook: Beyond Just War; A Virtue Ethics Appr David K. Chan Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012 ethics.Ju

detumescence

書目名稱Beyond Just War影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Beyond Just War影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Just War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Beyond Just War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Just War被引頻次




書目名稱Beyond Just War被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Just War年度引用




書目名稱Beyond Just War年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Beyond Just War讀者反饋




書目名稱Beyond Just War讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

BOLT

案發(fā)地點(diǎn)

Just War Reconsidered,acceptable, including violence used to defend one’s life or the lives of those that one loves. On the face of it, this is rather implausible. In the context of the ethics of war, the question arises of what, for instance, a pacifist in Britain would do to stop Hitler from invading Britain and spread

Aboveboard

陶器

Ibd810

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39460-2acceptable, including violence used to defend one’s life or the lives of those that one loves. On the face of it, this is rather implausible. In the context of the ethics of war, the question arises of what, for instance, a pacifist in Britain would do to stop Hitler from invading Britain and spread

金盤是高原

不能妥協(xié)

Phenothiazines

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39460-2d to the theory is pacifism: the view that war is always morally wrong. There are two ways to get from just war theory to pacifism. One is to take as fundamentally correct the view that war is morally wrong and, therefore, unjustifiable. So even if the conditions of just war theory are satisfied, it

異端邪說2

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39460-2radition are concerned with justifying what is done in war in terms of rights and duties. Thus, one may think, for instance, that one should reexamine what the right of self-defense and the duty not to kill innocent people involves. Other moral theories, for example utilitarianism, treat rights and