Titlebook: Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy; Eerik Lagerspetz,Oili Pulkkinen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if appl

果仁

Distrust and Democracytion in a democratic system is to express distrust. This chapter discusses several classical theories of democracy and argues that they do not conceptualize the role of institutionalized distrust in a satisfactory way. Hegel’s theory of recognition, as formulated in his ., provides some conceptual t

gout109

流動(dòng)性

Carl Schmitt and the Political Theology of Populismogical understanding of democracy, which assimilates political leadership into prophetic authority, implies an expressive or identitarian conception of democratic community. The latter is at odds with a genuinely democratic understanding of popular consent and liable to provide ideological cover for

確定無(wú)疑

Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: The Illiberal Challengeems that hold potentially competitive elections but undermine democratic norms by various authoritarian means. Such political systems are often labelled ‘illiberal democracies’, but they should not even be granted the veneer of democracy, as their procedures significantly skew elections. Instead, il

Accord

superfluous

itinerary

From the Democracy of Opinions to the Democracy of Proceduresch are then transferred to political decisions in elections and parliamentary resolutions. The opposite view uses questions on the political agenda as the point of departure and regards both election campaigns and parliamentary debate as procedures to modify the given opinions towards forming politi

Middle-Ear

Ordeal

On the Concept and Practice of Democracy in Late-Modern Mass Conditions: An Oakeshottian Updatet that it would be beneficial to differentiate between these more carefully. I discuss some points made earlier, especially by Michael Oakeshott and Bernard Crick. Due to their long careers, their work reflects long-term change in conceptions of democracy. The huge corporate power and superpower men

羊欄

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9847-7t empower laymen in identifying trustworthy experts; (c) a stable ‘veritistic equilibrium’ in trust-networks that ensures a ‘truth-conserving’ distribution of knowledge; (d) the resilience of trustworthy science in the digital world, where it is endangered most. The results of this analysis can, in