Titlebook: Bergson and Phenomenology; Michael R. Kelly (teaches philosophy) Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

gregarious

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems concepts of time held by philosophers other than Sartre. The author, however, has no intention of hiding his own Bergsonian-Jamesian alliances. The concluding section (4) utilizes earlier interpretations of Sartrean temporali-zation to critique Sartre in the light of Bergson’s concept of inner dura

確定方向

Dejen Alemu,Murray E. Jennex,Temtem Assefaon does not follow the articulations of the real but condenses, solidifies and immobilizes reality in order to better manipulate and act upon it (EC 300–3/749-51). Vision sees neither the moving continuity of the material universe, nor the qualitative heterogeneity of life, rather it projects behind

Collision

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95153-9itates, in its fallenness, an immobile eternity, or in Heidegger, where possibility is no longer referred to . as a ..’. This and other scattered attestations to Bergson’s significance, from . . to ., stand in sharp contrast to the critically sustained engagement with Heidegger’s thinking and that o

虛情假意

Seifu Girma Zeleke,Beneyam Berehanu Haile mixes metaphysical, biological, psychological, and sometimes even theological elements of thought. Pierre Maine de Biran is clearly at the head of this vitalistic trend, with Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze being its most renowned recent incumbents. Of course, there remain sharp differences between these

兇兆

Alemu Workneh,Dereje Teferi,Alemu Kumilachewy as a phenomenon in its own right. Is there a phenomenality specific to life, apart from the manifestations of life exhibited by living creatures? At first it seems doubtful that what is specific to life as such is describable as a phenomenon. Rather it seems that life is felt from within, going be

Scintillations

Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologieshenomenology,’ that of Husserl at least. For both these philosophers, to return to the ‘things themselves’ is neither to escape from our consciousness nor from our lives, but to criticize a false conception of each (and through them of all things), and to return to them in their immediate and intima

尖牙

Ha-Bang Ban,Dang-Hai Pham,Tuan-Anh Doing point was the a priori of the correlation and the question of the meaning of being of the subject as a condition of appearance. We concluded from the analysis of the correlation’s own constraints that the subject’s meaning of being must be sought in what we have characterized as ., emphasizing t

animated

Introduction: Bergson’s Phenomenological Reception: the Spirit of a Dialogue of Self-Resistancehilosophy’ would receive such scant attention from phenomenology — both in its emergence as the dominant discourse in continental philosophy and its persistence as such today.. Despite Bergson’s immense popularity at the turn of the twentieth century, the French philosopher Péguy suggested as early

他日關稅重重

Myelin

Bergson on the Driven Force of Consciousness and Lifecessant creative surpassing of previous accomplishments. Bergson is also the thinker of an ontological difference understood as transcendence. That is, he never confuses consciousness with distinct experiences or psychological states, life with the (species of) living beings or the spirit with its e