Titlebook: Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy; Sally Frampton Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

Glitch

書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy被引頻次




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy年度引用




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy讀者反饋




書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

nephritis

Axon895

ury medicine and society.Provides a new analytical framework.This open access book looks at the dramatic history of ovariotomy, an operation to remove ovarian tumours first practiced in the early nineteenth century. Bold and daring, surgeons who performed it claimed to be initiating a new era of sur

Intercept

人造

cogitate

Conclusion,ovation process can be treated as self-evident; and that which we might initially take for granted as being unambiguous about an innovation: its beginning, its ending, even its definition, are not necessarily so.

Culpable

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018ability. This book traces the operation’s innovation, from its roots in eighteenth-century pathology, through the denouncement of those who performed it as ‘belly-rippers’, to its rapid uptake in the 1880s, when ovariotomists were accused of over-operating. Throughout the century, the operation was never a hair’s breadth from controversy..

高腳酒杯

細(xì)微差別

On the Asymmetry of Economic Cyclesrade and business, which nonetheless was often gendered. The powerful financial connotations of ovariotomy were revealing not only of the ascendance of surgeons’ professional status (in which money played an implicit role) but also the pecuniary gains—and losses—that association with surgical innovation could bring.

羞辱