Titlebook: Belief and Knowledge; Robert J. Ackermann Textbook 1972Latest edition Robert John Ackermann 1972 epistemology.knowledge.philosophy.religio

復(fù)雜

書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Belief and Knowledge讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

松軟無(wú)力

Industrie und Sozialwissenschaftene that ., since he can answer any relevant non-metaphysical objection to . and therefore has sufficient reason to believe .. (2) is then true of a rational agent given what we have said about knowledge and belief to this point. That (2) is true of a rational agent seems to be agreed by most of the p

septicemia

印第安人

Consistent Belief,al analysis. There is literally no statement about human beliefs that holds true for the four kinds of belief we have noted, or even for any arbitrarily selected pair of kinds of belief. For example, consider the following claim:

paleolithic

Rational Belief,efs by determining whether it could be incorporated into an infinite set of sentences that were logically consistent. Consistent rational belief, however, even consistent rational belief in our defined sense, may seem only a partial criterion for what is known intuitively as rational belief. We can

榮幸

Kinds of Knowledge, before analysis can yield any interesting results. A restriction that was imposed on belief to yield results was to limit belief to factual belief. In a similar way, philosophical analysis of knowledge has been directed almost entirely to factual knowledge. The significance of this restriction is s

無(wú)能力之人

自作多情

HARP

ureter