Titlebook: Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science; Erik J. Olsson,Sebastian Enqvist Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 AGM Theo

FORGE

書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引頻次




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science讀者反饋




書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Supplement

bromide

Industrie 4.0 in der Textilproduktionherence, which shows how political and economic goals can bias the evaluation of evidence and produce irrational rejection of claims about global warming. Finally, we argue that explanatory coherence gives a better account of belief revision than major alternatives including logicist and Bayesian theories.

Panther

Book 2011ly) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains.One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate,

友好關(guān)系

Dieter Steegmüller,Michael Zürnds. Finally, I argue that part of what feeds the functionalist-relationalist controversy is a false dilemma based on an implausible conception of what it means rationally to suspend judgment. Making this precise requires a formal framework that includes a representation of the agent’s research agenda.

顯而易見

Enrage

Leaven

Jacket

Lumbar-Spine