找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Being Apart from Reasons; The Role of Reasons Cláudio Michelon Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Deliberation.Habermas.J

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 51879|回復(fù): 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:10:40 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Being Apart from Reasons
期刊簡稱The Role of Reasons
影響因子2023Cláudio Michelon
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/183/182983/182983.mp4
發(fā)行地址Compares public and private decision-making, proving them to be ethically different.Raises an original objection against Neutralist Liberalism (e.g Rawls).Raises an original objection to Joseph Raz’s
學(xué)科分類Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Being Apart from Reasons; The Role of Reasons  Cláudio Michelon Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Deliberation.Habermas.J
影響因子.Being Apart from Reasons. deals with the question of how we should go about using reasons to decide what to do. More particularly, the book presents objections to the most common response given by contemporary legal and political theorists to the moral complexity of decision-making in modern societies, namely: the attempt to release public agents from their argumentative burden by insulating a particular set of reasons from the general pool of reasons and assigning the former systematic priority over all other reasons. ..That strategy is apparent both in Rawls’ claim that reasons concerning the right are systematically prior to reasons concerning the good and in Raz’s claim that pre-emptive reasons are systematically prior to first-order reasons. The same strategy is also instantiated by certain arguments for the procedural value of law, such as Jeremy Waldron’s. In the book, each of those arguments for the insulation of reasons is objected to in order to defend the thesis the reasoning by public agents must always be as comprehensive as possible...The remaining chapters object to those arguments mentioned above which aim at justifying the exclusion of certain reasons from public
Pindex Book 2006
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons被引頻次




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons年度引用




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons讀者反饋




書目名稱Being Apart from Reasons讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:00:22 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:51:43 | 只看該作者
Being Apart from Reasons978-1-4020-4283-6Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:35:28 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4283-3Deliberation; Habermas; John Rawls; Jürgen Habermas; Legal Reasoning; Moral Reasoning; Public Decision-Mak
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:37:12 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:47:21 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:39:27 | 只看該作者
Modernity: Urban Culture and the Balkans,efs arrived at through reasoning and, second, at demonstrating how a substantive argument for this thesis would be able to defeat the argument that if reasoning brings about more certainty about what is morally correct, it follows that one should always reason before acting. To be sure, the thesis t
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:43:55 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21571-3g, even if one accepts that reasoning brings more certainty about the morally correct course of action. In the present chapter I turn to the problem of whether or not reasons of that kind can justify that a public agent is not obliged to reason before acting in the exercise of her public office. Not
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:33:26 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21571-3 they not always to .. We saw in the first chapter that there are good reasons to believe that reasons are not always the best ‘motive’ for action. That an action is brought about as a result of stimulating an agent’s settled dispositions of character might be not only morally acceptable, but also m
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:30:19 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 09:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
玛多县| 眉山市| 菏泽市| 合山市| 通河县| 泸州市| 吉林省| 蛟河市| 临清市| 井陉县| 北流市| 麦盖提县| 余干县| 白水县| 定兴县| 东辽县| 南康市| 博罗县| 神农架林区| 句容市| 东海县| 赤城县| 彰化市| 房产| 衡阳县| 临西县| 乃东县| 林甸县| 西青区| 梨树县| 广饶县| 文水县| 普洱| 罗源县| 亳州市| 达孜县| 绥滨县| 抚松县| 友谊县| 西平县| 丽江市|