Titlebook: Behavioural Foundations of Economics; J. L. Baxter Book 1993 J. L. Baxter 1993 attention.decision making.economics

候選人名單

書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics被引頻次




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics年度引用




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics讀者反饋




書目名稱Behavioural Foundations of Economics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Lignans

neolith

PRISE

STING

TH. Büchner,W. Hiddemann,R. Schneidernding of economic behaviour, in particular in the fields of consumer behaviour and labour market behaviour. An interesting feature of the earlier analysis was the manner in which the common behavioural foundations helped to cement links between the different fields of study. In economics, the common

GUEER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66011-5iven our present state of knowledge, what factors determine the actions of individuals, and how they arrive at their decisions. Unlike standard economics, however, I do not envisage individuals as living very largely in a vacuum, with their actions determined by forces somehow detached from the very

humectant

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66011-5ic unit of our analysis. These personal characteristics play a central role in determining individual behaviour in a wide variety of settings, including many which are of interest to economists. I shall be concentrating principally on motivation, a large and diverse subject area in psychology, and o

Mediocre

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72760-6uence the way another individual, or even a group of individuals, behaves in the process of taking decisions about such matters as how (and indeed whether) to spend his, or her, money. Similarly, a group of people may influence the decision-making of a lone individual, or decision-making by other gr

jabber

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0773-3conomists, there is a growing recognition that economists have also failed lamentably to take adequate account of the physical environment in their deliberations. These sins of omission have given rise to heightened concern as the twentieth century has progressed and social and environmental problem

Ancestor

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0773-3I shall, however, be drawing attention to those features which have received inadequate attention from economists, usually, it seems, because they are believed to fall outside the customary remit of economics. Such outdated notions of subject boundaries are gradually crumbling, but the process still