Titlebook: Behavioral Decision Analysis; Florian M. Federspiel,Gilberto Montibeller,Matthia Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

文化修養(yǎng)

書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis被引頻次




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis年度引用




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis讀者反饋




書目名稱Behavioral Decision Analysis讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

公豬

Should an Analyst Share Calibration Information with Experts?, managerial judgments in a less complex task, but it does reduce the bias and (especially) noise in a more complex task, (c) Numeracy does not impact the use of calibration information by experts regardless of task complexity, and (d) Individuals are able to directionally discern whether they are do

GRAVE

JEER

NOT

Consequences of Missing Objectives in Applications of Multiattribute Utility Analysis,are agreement between models that use the originally identified objectives with models constructed from only a subset of objectives using performance metrics related to the top choice, value loss, and rank ordering of alternatives. Analyses of the MAU applications considered suggest that the consequ

refine

Behavioral Challenges in Practice When Dealing with Public Environmental Decision Problems,itation and gamification. For MCDA modeling, we should check that stakeholders agree with model assumptions. To deal with uncertainty in practice, I propose stepwise interactive sensitivity analyses. Throughout, I reference application examples and summarize research opportunities. We need to unders

伴隨而來

Team Decision Making,s that require learning, and in moral dilemmas. In addition, this review discusses the important role of self-selection into teams and its potential consequences. Finally, the survey covers relevant field experiments that complement the literature on decision-making by looking at how team-based ince

TAG

Book 2024ed on task focus (prediction or decision) and behavioral level (individual or group). Two theoretical lenses that lie at the interface between (1) normative and descriptive research, and (2) normative and prescriptive research are introduced. The book then proceeds to highlight representative works

客觀

Alessandro Montanari,Christian Koeberld deviations from rationality, but rather than developing theories of models to explain these deviations, it develops and tests tools or analytical methods to correct such deviations. The distinction between the descriptive and prescriptive perspectives in Behavioral Decision Research has often been

Torrid

Impact stratigraphy in the U-M sequence, managerial judgments in a less complex task, but it does reduce the bias and (especially) noise in a more complex task, (c) Numeracy does not impact the use of calibration information by experts regardless of task complexity, and (d) Individuals are able to directionally discern whether they are do