Titlebook: Beckett‘s Proust/Deleuze‘s Proust; Mary Bryden,Margaret Topping Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2

BARB

Richie Ang,Owen Noel Newton Fernandoand cultural critic Gilles Deleuze (1925–95). Proust’s ‘roman de l’entre-deux’ [in-between novel], as Antoine Compagnon has described ., provides the pivot, in this volume, on which Beckett and Deleuze balance their positions, constantly shifting in relation to Proust and to each other. Proust, the

手段

全面

Hamper

LASH

Marcielo Bell,June Wei,Guillermo Francia III a first reading of ., is the assumption that this essay is an excavation, a literary critical exegesis of signs at work in Proust’s text. Jonathan Culler, in his ., captures the wonder such a reading of Deleuze will inevitably provoke:

neurologist

RADE

仔細(xì)檢查

Signs and Subjectivity in , and a first reading of ., is the assumption that this essay is an excavation, a literary critical exegesis of signs at work in Proust’s text. Jonathan Culler, in his ., captures the wonder such a reading of Deleuze will inevitably provoke:

新義

業(yè)余愛好者

The Embarrassment of Meeting: Burroughs, Beckett, Proust (and Deleuze)go, Beckett shook hands with them. ‘Clearly’, recalled Burroughs, ‘he had not the slightest desire to see any of them ever again. You could imagine him turning in disinterest from an extraterrestrial’ ., p.31).