Titlebook: Bearing Witness; Ruth Harrison and Br Claas Kirchhelle Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2021 The Editor(s) if applicable and The Author(s), under exclusive lic

amateur

書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Bearing Witness讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

消散

加花粗鄙人

Management, Work and Organisationsmobilised anecdotal and scientific evidence as well as visual material to create a powerful moral contrast between a threatened romanticised countryside and a desensitised dystopian future characterised by the “factory farm.”

ESPY

Industrial Relations in the NHS,tee (FAWAC) but only implemented some of the other Brambell proposals. Concerned about stalling momentum, Harrison successfully used her status as a charismatic but “moderate” public figure to gain access to FAWAC and the political backstage of British welfare consultation.

prediabetes

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05982-8s formation. However, tensions over her role on FAWAC and her focus on gradualist reforms isolated Harrison. Forced to declare bankruptcy after a libel suit against another Council member, Harrison focused on developing her own Farm Animal Care Trust (FACT).

Amendment

Human Resource Management and Developmentpublic recognition as a senior welfare campaigner enabled her to proactively push for reforms, expand her fundraising activities, and sponsor additional welfare research. By the late 1990s, most of her welfare positions had become part of mainstream politics.

FAR

Compensation and Benefit Systems sceptical of label claims and welfare’s transition from a moral into an economic value. Meanwhile, researchers continued to disagree on how to define welfare. While most researchers remained confident in their ability to produce meaningful results, animal welfare science entered a prolonged phase of epistemic navel-gazing.

抵消

葡萄糖

exclusice

Between Physiology and Psychology—Ethology and Animal FeelingsUniversity Federation of Animal Welfare and ethologists Julian Huxley and William Homan Thorpe used research on behaviour and stress to call for improved welfare. Their actions were strongly influenced by Edwardian concepts of science as a progressive force for the moral and spiritual improvement of human society.