Titlebook: Bayesian Argumentation; The practical side o Frank Zenker Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Ad Hominem Argument Baye

挫敗

Testimony and Argument: A Bayesian Perspective, Cambridge, 2008). This chapter treats this issue from the perspective of the Bayesian approach to argument (Hahn & Oaksford, Psychol Rev 114:704–732, 2007a; Hahn et al., Informal Log 29:337–367, 2009) and summarises empirical evidence on key intuitions.

配置

可卡

Lipohypertrophy

A Survey of Uncertainties and Their Consequences in Probabilistic Legal Argumentation of argumentation can facilitate litigation planning. We briefly survey Bayesian Networks as a representation for argumentation in the context of a realistic example. After introducing the Carneades argument model and its probabilistic semantics, we propose an extension to the Carneades Bayesian Net

不發(fā)音

Was It Wrong to Use Statistics in ,? A Case Study of the Use of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Couwas wrongfully convicted of murdering both her babies. In order to disprove a potential defence claim that the babies died of SIDS (aka cot death), the prosecution adduced statistics that allegedly showed that the probability of two SIDS deaths in a family similar to the Clarks was 1 in 73 million.

dura-mater

BOLT

熒光

松軟無力

密切關(guān)系

On Argument Strength reasoning and argumentation. Coherence in the sense of de Finetti is used as the basic rationality norm. I discuss two basic classes of approaches to construct measures of argument strength. The first class imposes a probabilistic relation between the premises and the conclusion. The second class i