Titlebook: Battle Descriptions as Literary Texts; A comparative approa Johanna Luggin,Sebastian Fink Book 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, par

gregarious

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490254804, Napoleon had declared himself emperor and had famously placed the crown on his head with his own hands, rather than receiving it from the Pope. One year later, in December 1805, he defeated the Russian and Austrian armies at Austerlitz

偶然

HUMP

Year Names as Source for Military Campaigns in the Third Millennium BC,s to show the potential of year names in such studies. This work comprises two parts: an introduction in which the concept “year name” is discussed and a second part presenting the information that year names yield on military campaigns, which is assembled in the Appendix to the article.

親屬

Much Ado about Nothing?, port on the Mediterranean coast is in order. Afterwards, searching for the epigraphic sources with battle descriptions we will arrive at the rather disappointing result that there is nothing of this kind in Ugarit, at least in the narrow sense of the word, i. e. no description of a real battle. The

Calibrate

Victor without Victory?,d inscriptions is the avoidance of battles and sieges. Where Neo-Assyrian or imperial Roman monuments proudly describe their victories, surviving Achaemenid texts and reliefs are much more restrained. Why this should be is a fascinating and difficult question, and this article can only provide a bri

猛烈責(zé)罵

內(nèi)部

,?Eine Schlacht wie keine andere“ – alles nur Literatur, oder was?,sste übernommen werden, ohne dass es ein geeignetes Integrations- oder ?Reichskonzept“ gegeben h?tte. Nach wie vor waren die Spartaner zudem mit den Persern konfrontiert – ein Kr?ftemessen um die griechischen St?dte Kleinasiens, das Sparta im Grunde überforderte. Und auch in Griechenland selbst regt

FAST

Parody as a Sign of Generic Consciousness: Battle Descriptions in the Pseudo-Homeric ,enre characterised by incongruity between form and content, thus undermining the seriousness of its hypotext. This view was first challenged by Russian formalism. In several essays, most notably in his treatment of ., Viktor Shklovsky has argued that “it is the consciousness of form through its viol

BILL