找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Bargaining Power; Health Policymaking Verna Smith Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Health Policy in England

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Mottled
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:15:33 | 只看該作者
A Comparison of the English and New Zealand General Practice Sub-Systems,etween general practitioners and the state in England is contrasted with the growth of a multi-payer system in New Zealand in which general practitioners had a fractious relationship and no formal partnership with the state.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:55:43 | 只看該作者
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in England,e. Kingdon’s Framework is the most useful approach but fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors at work. Amendments to the Framework to reflect ownership and governance arrangements and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:27:25 | 只看該作者
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in New Zealand,l. However, it fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors or the influence of history at work. Amendments to the Framework reflecting historical antecedents, ownership and governance arrangements, and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:12:52 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:31:42 | 只看該作者
A Tale of Two Countries,g the comparative utility of single-approach theories that cite the influence of institutions, interest groups, the rational choices made by individuals, ideas or socio-economic factors, and a multi-theoretic approach, John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:51:32 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:36:43 | 只看該作者
New Zealand: Context and the Performance Programme,e detailed story of the process to bring these to fruition are told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers that threatened the process and enablers that supported it are described and discussed.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:27:53 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,and New Zealand between 2001 and 2007. Rare rich descriptions of public policymaking in the general practice sub-systems of these two countries are delivered, offering many insights of both practical and theoretical assistance to those interested in the dynamics of policymaking.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:03:35 | 只看該作者
stminster majoritarian jurisdictions is tested and, based on rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement.?.The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to negotiate successfully with general practitioners.??.978-981-10-7602-2
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:07:06 | 只看該作者
Book 2018ucted in England and New Zealand. The Framework’s explanatory power for policymaking in Westminster majoritarian jurisdictions is tested and, based on rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement.?.The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 18:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
郑州市| 五常市| 曲阜市| 永安市| 盐山县| 昌吉市| 密山市| 哈巴河县| 建阳市| 尤溪县| 崇礼县| 施甸县| 通山县| 蓬安县| 漳平市| 吉隆县| 尤溪县| 加查县| 高密市| 抚松县| 万全县| 平南县| 武鸣县| 新郑市| 饶阳县| 于田县| 图木舒克市| 西畴县| 云安县| 五常市| 永胜县| 宁海县| 昭苏县| 信丰县| 沙湾县| 桑植县| 阳原县| 日照市| 都安| 通榆县| 泸溪县|