Titlebook: Bad Presidents; Failure in the White Philip Abbott Book 2013 Philip Abbott 2013 bush.classification.hand.idea.interpret.success.William Jam

繁榮中國(guó)

生存環(huán)境

Armin T?pfer,Steffen Silbermannat ranks presidential performance as a research activity leads not to a rigorous and robust body of knowledge in presidential studies as Glad predicts but rather to a version of the emperor’s encyclopedia described by Jorge Luis Borges in which phenomena are cataloged in a completely ersatz fashion?

傾聽(tīng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04136-6nstitutional government in the United States.”. It is certainly true that Johnson’s general reputation rose first as a result of negative reassessments of Reconstruction and then as a result of negative reassessments of the Civil War in the 1930s. He was ranked nineteenth out of twenty-nine presiden

Gratuitous

Julia Wustmann,Michaela Pfadenhauerd villainy / With odd old ends stole forth of holy writ / and seem a saint, when most I play the devil”) and Nixon’s (“You won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore”; “Well, I am not a crook”; “Generally you can’t trust the bastards. They turn on us”; and “With regard to the bombing. You’re so goddamn

興奮過(guò)度

Classifications: Kings and Presidents,at ranks presidential performance as a research activity leads not to a rigorous and robust body of knowledge in presidential studies as Glad predicts but rather to a version of the emperor’s encyclopedia described by Jorge Luis Borges in which phenomena are cataloged in a completely ersatz fashion?

填滿

Lincoln in Reverse: Andrew Johnson,nstitutional government in the United States.”. It is certainly true that Johnson’s general reputation rose first as a result of negative reassessments of Reconstruction and then as a result of negative reassessments of the Civil War in the 1930s. He was ranked nineteenth out of twenty-nine presiden

事情

Maximize

打折

寬宏大量

Book 2013Bad Presidents seeks to interpret the meaning of presidential ‘badness‘ by investigating the ways in which eleven presidents were ‘bad.‘ The author brings a unique, and often amusing perspective on the idea of the presidency, and begins a new conversation about the definition of presidential success and failure.