Titlebook: Automated Deduction - CADE-14; 14th International C William McCune Conference proceedings 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997 AI lo

locus-ceruleus

https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48398-Xmiliar with ME, this tool helps to structure larger proofs and makes them understandable (and printable). Its LATEX-post-processing features allows a proof to be represented in its original, problem-oriented notation, instead of SETHEO‘s hard to read ASCII prefix notation. For all kinds of applicati

BULLY

mucous-membrane

,The birth of Arall (1945–1981),s at automatically producing symbolic solutions of inverse kinematics in closed form for the existing industrial robots so far as we know. In this paper, we make use of the algebraic properties of closure equation described in [RR90] to obtain a set of additional equations, then solve the new system

vertebrate

Rita L. Storch,Ivan Bodis-Wollner. The protocols and their properties are specified using the so-called BAN logic, a multi-sorted modal logic capable of expressing beliefs about secure communication. The resulting formulas and inference rules are transformed into first order predicate logic and processed by the prover SETHEO. Proof

galley

Jerry D. Cavallerano,Lloyd M. Aielloge. The procedure is designed to be practical: formulas can have large complex boolean structure, and include structure sharing in the form of let- expressions. The decision procedures are only required to decide the unsatisfiability of sets of literals. However, .-refuting substitutions are used wh

PALMY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07497-8ions known from the literature rest on permutations of inferences in classical proofs. We show that, for some classes of first-order formulae, all minimal LJ-proofs are non-elementary but there exist short LK-proofs of the same formula. Similar results are obtained even if some fragments of intuitio

famine

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07497-8the use of arbitrary classical theorem provers for deciding the intuitionistic validity of a given propositional formula. The translation is based on the constructive description of a finite counter-model for any intuitionistic non-theorem. This enables us to replace universal quantification over al

一個姐姐

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07495-4own theorem proving involves a huge amount of redundancy, which are caused by recomputation of identical goals and/or by irrelevant computation to a targeted goal, and so on. Lemma matching has the ability of preventing some of these redundant computations. Lemma matching rules are . in the sense th

adhesive

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07495-4ogic. A solution to this incompleteness is to compile the knowledge base so that forward chaining becomes complete for any base of facts. This compilation is called achievement and was so far restricted to propositional calculus. In this paper, we extend this compilation method to the predicate calc

MAIZE