找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Austerity vs Stimulus; The Political Future Robert Skidelsky,Nicolò Fraccaroli Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 24614|回復(fù): 57
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:25:14 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Austerity vs Stimulus
期刊簡稱The Political Future
影響因子2023Robert Skidelsky,Nicolò Fraccaroli
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/166/165832/165832.mp4
發(fā)行地址Presents contemporary views on austerity v stimulus from the world‘s leading economic figures in one collection.Provides readers with the tools necessary to engage in the debate.Concludes with an outl
圖書封面Titlebook: Austerity vs Stimulus; The Political Future Robert Skidelsky,Nicolò Fraccaroli Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20
影響因子This timely book debates the economic and political logic of the austerity policies that have been implemented in the UK and in the Eurozone since 2010 and asks whether there is any alternative for these countries in the years ahead. The work reconsiders the austerity versus stimulus debate through the voices of those who proposed the successful idea of expansionary austerity and those who opposed it. The editors have brought together a collection of articles written by some of the most notable figures in the discipline, including the likes of Alberto Alesina, Ken Rogoff, Tim Besley, David Graeber, Vince Cable, and Paul Krugman. The book also features the debate between Niall Ferguson and Robert Skidelsky. These leading thinkers unveil a world where economists are far from agreeing on economic policy, and where politics often dominates the discussion. The question of whether the British government should have opted for austerity runs through the book, as well as how sustained economicrecovery should be encouraged in the future. Scholars, students and members of the general public with an interest in the financial crisis and its lingering aftermath will find this work invaluable.
Pindex Book 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus被引頻次




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus年度引用




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus讀者反饋




書目名稱Austerity vs Stimulus讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:55:34 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:04:01 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:13:34 | 只看該作者
Austerity: A Solution to Restore Markets’ Confidencely be focusing on is the budget-tightening’s composition (tax versus spending) and on the accompanying policies. Indeed, […] “Has austerity gone too far?” reflects this inappropriate emphasis on size. In our view, the essential question is not “how far” governments go but of “how” they go far enough.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:59:03 | 只看該作者
Confidence Beyond Debt: The Role of Monetary Policys thus logical to judge the central bank’s actions first and foremost according to this parameter (as narrow as it may be), especially since one of the stated aims of the ECB’s QE program is to bring the inflation rate back towards the 2% target.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:29:36 | 只看該作者
,What Does It Mean “Metal Cutting”?,borators’ work in defining and defending the modern policy case for austerity cannot be overestimated” as reported by Blyth (Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea, Oxford University Press, Oxford, ., p. 167).
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:27:15 | 只看該作者
,What Does It Mean “Metal Cutting”?,e ruling government and most of the media still support the austerity ideology. Through an inquiry into the history of austerity in its economic and political dimension, Krugman explains how we got to where we are.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:02:56 | 只看該作者
Erik M. Alfsen,Frederic W. Shultzly be focusing on is the budget-tightening’s composition (tax versus spending) and on the accompanying policies. Indeed, […] “Has austerity gone too far?” reflects this inappropriate emphasis on size. In our view, the essential question is not “how far” governments go but of “how” they go far enough.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:06:52 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:42:11 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 09:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
区。| 满城县| 杭锦后旗| 子洲县| 会宁县| 诏安县| 恭城| 宁都县| 桂平市| 石景山区| 吴桥县| 西盟| 麻城市| 昆山市| 皮山县| 蕉岭县| 长海县| 镇康县| 滨海县| 吴堡县| 故城县| 县级市| 宿松县| 勐海县| 城市| 东宁县| 新野县| 麦盖提县| 通州区| 霍山县| 宁国市| 樟树市| 定安县| 资中县| 库车县| 三穗县| 兴山县| 襄城县| 福鼎市| 齐齐哈尔市| 阿拉善右旗|