Titlebook: Articulations of Nature and Politics in Plato and Hegel; Vicky Roupa Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

legislate

Producing the Categories of Being: The , ,ed in the space opened up by the concept’s logical possibility. I discuss the implications this has for Hegel’s broader philosophical project, and conclude the chapter with some comments on the resistance natural languages display towards the expression of philosophical truths. Part I is concluded w

hidebound

The Question of Nature in the e passage from the ‘first city’ to the . in Plato’s thought is coincidental with a trauma. This trauma is to be understood both in political terms (the possibility of civil war) and in psychological terms (the impact of Socrates’ death). I conclude the chapter with some comments on the philosopher’s

被詛咒的人

情愛(ài)

5. Representing Knowledge for Adaptation,ure and its link with politics by returning to two seminal philosophers, Plato and Hegel, for whom the natural and the political articulate at multiple junctures. The chapter outlines the main contribution each philosopher makes, explains the rationale, scope and interpretive strategy of the project

合同

exclusice

5. Representing Knowledge for Adaptation, from Cratylian naturalism and its metaphysical commitments, Parmenidean naturalism also stipulates a coincidence between being and language inasmuch as it calls upon the inquirer to desist, in the interests of truth, from trying to say or think that which is .. I discuss the portion of the dialogue

Commentary

5. Representing Knowledge for Adaptation,ed in the space opened up by the concept’s logical possibility. I discuss the implications this has for Hegel’s broader philosophical project, and conclude the chapter with some comments on the resistance natural languages display towards the expression of philosophical truths. Part I is concluded w

Interferons

5. Representing Knowledge for Adaptation,e passage from the ‘first city’ to the . in Plato’s thought is coincidental with a trauma. This trauma is to be understood both in political terms (the possibility of civil war) and in psychological terms (the impact of Socrates’ death). I conclude the chapter with some comments on the philosopher’s

閑蕩

4. Assessing Experience Utility,onsider Hegel’s critique of Fichte in his early essay on ‘Natural Law’ arguing that far from reverting to the political theory of an earlier era, as some commentators have argued, Hegel makes use of the conceptual apparatus of the ancient philosophers in order to bring out the one-sidedness and inad

誤傳