Titlebook: Artefact Kinds; Ontology and the Hum Maarten Franssen,Peter Kroes,Pieter E. Vermaas Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

寬度

Jukka Hy?n?,Johanna K. Kaakinenions that take an epistemological or ethnographic perspective show the common ground between the contributions that address the problem of artefact kinds from a traditional philosophical perspective and the contributions that focus on artefact classification and “ontology engineering” from an engineering perspective.

使迷醉

Disorders of Eye-Head Coordination, enables us to provide a better account of artifact categorization, solve old puzzles about exaptation and minimal creation, and provide a better understanding of the significance of artifacts in our lives and in the social sciences.

Asparagus

Interim

ventilate

瘙癢

Engineering Differences Between Natural, Social, and Artificial Kindsicial kinds are marked by distinctive classificatory practices. The presence of these distinctive classificatory practices in engineering with regard to artificial kinds should inform discussions about the ontology of technical artifacts just as the distinctive classificatory practices in natural science inform discussions about natural kinds.

藝術(shù)

Artefact Kinds978-3-319-00801-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

停止償付

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19443-7eliminated through the use of a tool allowing for the gradual approximation of inadequate but normally adopted identity criteria. Although this does not solve the problem of so-called ontological respectability of artifacts, it shows that the mere lack of transitivity cannot be used to argue that artifacts are not ontologically respectable.

膽小鬼

ADJ