Titlebook: Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment; A Defense of State S David T. Schwartz Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2000 P

加冕

書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

notification

The Tradition of Subsidy: Art and Cultural Perfection,government funding is justified because art has intrinsic value. The chapter begins by presenting the basic perfectionist argument, while subsequent sections each examine a distinct mode of criticizing that argument. One sort of criticism focuses on perfectionism as a political principle, including

狗舍

The Commitment to Democracy,subsidy. The remainder of this book seeks to formulate such an alternative. Rather than claiming a life with art is intrinsically superior to other ways of living, the book argues the arts are . valuable to what is perhaps our most widely-held public value—democratic self-rule. This chapter lays the

吞噬

Empathy, Interpretation, and Judgment: The Case for Art,ust opportunities for political education. While claims are often and easily made about art’s value for . education, here I build on Chapter Two in arguing that the arts also have important value for . education. To make the case for art as democratic education, this chapter describes how aesthetica

遺留之物

Munificent

香料

BOLUS

浸軟

侵略者

Book 2000of the arts-is cast in the Anglo- American tradition of analytical philosophy. Here normative arguments of ethics and politics are scrutinized with an eye toward developing a defensible justification of state action. Yet while the book initially situates the subsidy problem within this analytical tr