Titlebook: Art and Politics under Modern Dictatorships; A Comparison of Chil Caterina Preda Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

新義

Flavouring

,The Two Modern Dictatorships in Romania and Chile 1970s–1989,, the .. Pinochet’s military regime, supported by ideologically diverse groups, put into place neoliberal reforms, which led to a transformed societal model and were maintained through the use of force.

會議

Thinking About Religion and Science,aches to the arts, their official stances on art, and the types of artistic responses they receive. Analyzing the role of art and of the artist in contexts with opposing demands shows their range of reactions, which includes compliance, resistance or critique, and replacement of the political.

粗糙

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07162-5 past; the attempt to establish a broad nationalist cultural policy; the privilege granted to high art and private, company art; and a televised model of promoting certain cultural expressions, such as soap operas and a bourgeois version of the folklore. Varied forms of censorship were enforced for literature, music, and film.

BLOT

International Human Rights Law,ist comedies, music, and architecture. The official art abandoned the mandatory Socialist Realist style in favor of a privileged nationalistic version of art, which gradually turned into homage art. The regime switched from promoting an art for the masses to an art produced by the masses themselves.

人類的發(fā)源

Extraterritoriality in EU Competition Lawimes, which transformed art into ideology. Finally, this section proposes a model for studying the role of art and culture during dictatorships, taking into account their ideological projects and their institutional frameworks, which range from a state that dominates to a market that is given a fundamental place.

sed-rate

Caterina PredaEnriches the reader‘s understanding of the way art and politics function in a dictatorship.Explores the neglected topic of art under non-democratic regimes.Presents a comparative analysis of the inter

HATCH

sclera

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45896-5ired by the left-wing resistance; a new metapolitics, as in the case of the .; and different type of distractions that, inspired by the market and aestheticism, proposed an escape rather than confrontation of the dictatorship. Each of these alternatives led to the politicization of art, the opposite of what the regime required and supported.

GRAIN