Titlebook: Art Matters; A Critical Commentar K. Harries Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.Martin Heide

催眠藥

管理員

廢止

先行

拱形面包

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3 attention to the remarkable way in which the structure of a simple proposition mirrors our understanding of the thing as a substance with attributes; and he had raised the question: “Is the structure of a simple propositional statement (the combination of subject and predicate) the mirror image of

消極詞匯

Information Engineering und IV-Controllingthought and reflection have overtaken the fine arts: we who are truly of today no longer can take seriously art’s claim to serve the truth. Challenging Hegel, Heidegger insists on a more intimate connection between truth and art, insists on that connection, even as he recognizes all that argues agai

ELUDE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3all?” A first answer is suggested by the preceding discussion. How are we to understand the truth of things, when we are no longer able to appeal to an allseeing God, when instead we follow Nietzsche and proclaim the death of God? Does the truth of things then not have to become ., the adequation of

Nucleate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3aces this being in the Open in such a way that what is to be brought forth first clears the openness of the Open into which it comes forth. Where this bringing forth expressly brings the openness of beings, or truth, that which is brought forth is a work. Creation is such a bringing forth. As such a

狗窩

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3essay draws to a close Heidegger becomes more specific and, notwithstanding the earlier emphasis on the Greek temple, insists that it depends especially on poetry, which is now given a certain primacy.

oblique