Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 8th International Wo Peter McBurney,Simon Parsons,Iyad Rahwan Conference proceedings 2012 Springer-Ve

威脅你

Mervyn S. Paterson,Teng-fong Wonged through evidence from past dialogues, and where these models are used to guide future argumentation strategy. We empirically evaluate our approach to demonstrate that decision-theoretic and machine learning techniques can both significantly improve the cumulative utility of dialogical outcomes, and help to reduce communication overhead.

Enervate

Syncretic Argumentation for Multi-agents by Lattice Homomorphism, Fusion and Sumder syncretized knowledge base. For the other, we first devise a new way of fusing two lattices through the lattice product, and then give a syncretic argumentation framework in which argumentation is done under the fused lattice. We further touch upon the third approach to the syncretic argumentation, by the lattice sum.

deadlock

Argumentation Strategies for Collaborative Plan Resourcinged through evidence from past dialogues, and where these models are used to guide future argumentation strategy. We empirically evaluate our approach to demonstrate that decision-theoretic and machine learning techniques can both significantly improve the cumulative utility of dialogical outcomes, and help to reduce communication overhead.

起草

Conference proceedings 2012erence. All together the 13 papers included in the book give a representative overview on current research on argumentation in multi-agent systems. The papers are listed alphabetically by first author within three thematic topics: foundations and theory; argumentation and dialogue; and applications.

無能性

0302-9743 representative overview on current research on argumentation in multi-agent systems. The papers are listed alphabetically by first author within three thematic topics: foundations and theory; argumentation and dialogue; and applications.978-3-642-33151-0978-3-642-33152-7Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

Anhydrous

口味

MIRTH

On the Outcomes of Multiparty Persuasionllow this protocol. We investigate in particular under which conditions the debate is pre-determined or not, and whether the outcome coincides with the result obtained by merging the argumentation systems.

condemn

Intercept