找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations; Steve Oswald,Thierry Herman,Jér?me Jacquin Book 2018 Sprin

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Baleful
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:22:39 | 只看該作者
Tracing the Roots of Defeasible Reasoning Through Argumentative Indicators: A Study of the Italian V . (‘seem’). Appearance verbs, due to their epistemic-modal and evidential-inferential features point to the presence of premises-conclusion relations. Moreover, their lexical semantics further constrain the types of inferences (argument schemes) which link premises to claims and can be more or less
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:36:55 | 只看該作者
What Is the Contribution of Connectives to Discourse Meaning? The With or Without Issue (WWI)which has been recognized in different theoretical frameworks: theory of linguistic argumentation (Ducrot et al. in Les mots du discours. Minuit, Paris, .), Relevance Theory (Blakemore in Semantic constraints on relevance. Blackwell, Oxford, .; Carston in Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of e
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:02:46 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 06:08:43 | 只看該作者
The Straw Man Fallacy as a Prestige-Gaining Deviceatic winner’ not primarily because of its persuasive power but rather because it targets the pragmatic cognitive-inferential skills of its victim while enhancing the prestige of its author. We consider that in the context of a straw man fallacy, the issue of the burden of proof, which is ‘reversed’,
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 08:27:11 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:39:50 | 只看該作者
Practical Argumentation in the Making: Discursive Construction of Reasons for Actiondiscursively in deliberative discussions. This is a topic largely neglected in the literature on PA focused primarily on the abstract features of practical inference. I connect to this literature by arguing that the complex scheme of PA inferentially hinges on three different principles for rational
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:58:49 | 只看該作者
Exercising Accountability in European Parliamentary Debates on Statements: An Argumentative Perspectioners in the European Parliament (EP). The accountability practice is characterised as an activity type (van Eemeren in Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, .), based on a careful examination of the in
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:20:01 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:59:08 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:30:30 | 只看該作者
,Moiré Patterns Formed by Remote Gratings,ion of the . conference series (ARGAGE), which took place at the University of Lausanne in September 2015. The thematic unity of this volume therefore stems from a common commitment, from all contributors, to the adoption of a linguistically-informed perspective applied to the study of argumentative practices.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
德格县| 宿州市| 五原县| 宜春市| 台山市| 瓮安县| 穆棱市| 越西县| 石狮市| 巴林左旗| 尉犁县| 六枝特区| 宜昌市| 红桥区| 古丈县| 江阴市| 鹤峰县| 裕民县| 平定县| 台州市| 奉贤区| 徐州市| 呼伦贝尔市| 崇仁县| 白玉县| 德庆县| 肇州县| 北流市| 金塔县| 澜沧| 肇州县| 乌拉特后旗| 嘉义县| 金山区| 滨海县| 丹东市| 开鲁县| 方山县| 论坛| 琼中| 班玛县|